Exploring Types of Qualitative Research Designs in TESOL

By Dalat TESOL
Helping new researchers navigate the rich landscape of qualitative inquiry in language education


📌 Introduction

Quantitative research tells you how much or how many—but qualitative research tells you how and why. If you’re exploring beliefs, classroom experiences, identity formation, or interaction patterns in TESOL, qualitative designs are essential.

But not all qualitative research is the same. Each design has its own logic, tools, and outcomes. This article introduces the most commonly used qualitative research designs in TESOL and applied linguistics—so you can choose one that fits your research question and context.


🧠 What is a Qualitative Research Design?

A qualitative design is the blueprint for how you collect, analyze, and interpret non-numerical data such as interviews, observations, written texts, or interactions.

Key features of qualitative designs:

  • Emphasize participants’ perspectives
  • Use open-ended or semi-structured data
  • Focus on depth over breadth
  • Are flexible, iterative, and context-sensitive

🔍 Overview of Major Qualitative Designs in TESOL

DesignPurposeCommon Data Sources
Case StudyDeep investigation of a bounded contextInterviews, documents, classroom observation
EthnographyCultural understanding of a group over timeFieldnotes, immersion, participant observation
Narrative InquiryUnderstanding lives through personal storiesLife histories, interviews, journals
PhenomenologyExploring lived experience of a phenomenonIn-depth interviews, reflection logs
Grounded TheoryDeveloping theory grounded in dataIterative interviews, memos, coding cycles
Action ResearchImproving local practices through reflectionCycles of intervention, reflection, data collection
Conversation Analysis (CA)Uncovering how talk is organized in interactionVideo/audio recordings, Jefferson transcription
Discourse Analysis (DA)Analyzing language use, power, and identity in textsTranscripts, written texts, multimodal data

📘 1. Case Study

Focus: A detailed exploration of a single case (e.g., a class, school, teacher, or learner)

When to use:

  • Your RQ centers on understanding a specific context
  • You want multiple types of data (interviews, documents, observations)

Example:
A case study of an EMI (English Medium Instruction) science teacher’s classroom practices in a Vietnamese university.

✅ Strength: rich, multi-perspective understanding
⚠️ Limitation: limited generalizability


🌍 2. Ethnography

Focus: Cultural practices and shared meanings in a group

When to use:

  • You’re studying how beliefs and norms shape behavior
  • You can immerse yourself in the community over time

Example:
An ethnographic study of translanguaging practices among multilingual students in a bilingual secondary school.

✅ Strength: in-depth, contextual insight into cultural patterns
⚠️ Limitation: time-intensive, requires trust-building


🧑‍🎓 3. Narrative Inquiry

Focus: Personal stories as a way of understanding experience

When to use:

  • You want to explore teacher or learner identity
  • You are interested in the temporal unfolding of experience

Example:
How a returning Vietnamese PhD graduate reconstructs academic identity after re-entering the local university system.

✅ Strength: honors voice and emotion
⚠️ Limitation: small samples, requires narrative sensibility


🌀 4. Phenomenology

Focus: The essence of lived experience around a shared phenomenon

When to use:

  • You explore emotional, sensory, or cognitive experiences
  • You seek depth over scope

Example:
Exploring the lived experience of writing anxiety among novice EFL university students.

✅ Strength: deep insight into human experience
⚠️ Limitation: interpretive, requires researcher reflexivity


🏗️ 5. Grounded Theory

Focus: Developing new theories based on emergent data

When to use:

  • There’s no existing theory that fully explains your phenomenon
  • You’re open to following what the data suggests

Example:
Building a theory of how EFL teachers develop AI literacy through informal learning.

✅ Strength: theory building from the ground up
⚠️ Limitation: time-intensive, requires multiple coding rounds


🔁 6. Action Research

Focus: Improving your own or your institution’s practice through research

When to use:

  • You’re both teacher and researcher
  • You want to test and reflect on a new method

Example:
Using action research to improve students’ engagement in reading circles in a Vietnamese university reading class.

✅ Strength: practical, empowering, reflective
⚠️ Limitation: may lack external objectivity


💬 7. Conversation Analysis (CA)

Focus: How interaction is organized (turn-taking, repair, sequence)

When to use:

  • You analyze real-time classroom or institutional talk
  • You have video/audio recordings and want to analyze transcripts

Example:
Turn-taking and teacher-student alignment in Vietnamese EAP classrooms.

✅ Strength: fine-grained insight into social interaction
⚠️ Limitation: requires transcription expertise (Jefferson system)


🗣️ 8. Discourse Analysis (DA)

Focus: How language constructs social realities (power, identity, positioning)

When to use:

  • You’re analyzing how texts, talks, or policies shape meaning
  • You want to examine identity, positioning, or ideology

Example:
A discourse analysis of teacher beliefs about AI in language learning across policy statements and interviews.

✅ Strength: links language and social structures
⚠️ Limitation: often abstract, interpretive


🎯 How to Choose the Right Design

Ask yourself:

  1. What is your main purpose?
    • Explore experience → Phenomenology
    • Develop theory → Grounded Theory
    • Understand context → Case Study/Ethnography
    • Change practice → Action Research
    • Analyze texts → DA or CA
  2. What data can you access ethically and realistically?
  3. Do you need to immerse in a site, follow a story, or record interactions?

📝 Tip: Match your design to your research questions, not the other way around.


✅ Final Checklist

StepConsideration
Research QuestionDoes it ask “how,” “why,” or “in what way”?
Design FitDoes the design align with your goal and context?
Data AccessCan you collect data ethically and meaningfully?
Time/SkillDo you have time and resources to analyze this type of data?

📚 Further Reading

  • Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design.
  • Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative Inquiry in TESOL.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation.

🌱 Final Thoughts

Qualitative designs offer rich insights into the lives, practices, and identities of language teachers and learners. The key is to choose the design that fits your research question—and to engage deeply with your participants and data.

“Good qualitative research doesn’t just ask questions—it listens, reflects, and respects complexity.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top